CM2000

Case studies

Buckinghamshire County Council
Published on 01 May 2005

During March Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC) became one of the growing number of Local Authorities to purchase CM2000's CallConfirmLive! Electronic Monitoring system.

For BCC like many Local Authorities the drivers for introducing a monitoring system were clear.

  • Cost savings on admini-stration and reduced potential for errors by replacing manual timesheets with electronic logging
  • Alert providers that a carer is potentially at risk because of an over-extended or over-late visit.
  • Alert providers that a high risk and/or time-critical visit hasn't happened.
  • Enable quality, performance and reliability monitoring of the domiciliary care services being provided.
  • Provide data that can be used to generate and support invoices from external providers.

At Sign SphereHowever, the decision to use Electronic Monitoring was not an easy one. With ever increasing demands on the limited resources available for Home Care and the need to ensure 'Best Value' it was felt that demonstrating cost effectiveness was critical and so Alan Mordue, an independent Business Consultant, was drafted in to establish a clear business case. It was hoped that the Business Case would not only help BCC make an informed decision, but the subsequent paper would help other Local Authorities going through a similar process.

Alan notes, "It became clear during the development of a business case for BCC, that demonstrating the cost effective-ness of an Electronic Monitoring system is a major hindrance to their deployment in other authorities, despite the significant re-assurances to the quality of care that can be provided. The nature of Electronic Monitoring systems is such that they need to be in place to provide the figures to justify their existence!"

Developing the business case involved a survey of existing provision, in order to establish the approximate costs of putting in and running a system. Seventeen other Local Authorities were then identified as having implemented or piloted Electronic Monitoring and a questionnaire sent out to them to explore the benefits of running a system.

The research covered; operating environment (including staff attitudes and implications for staff safety), operating costs, financial benefits gained, other benefits gained such as improved service quality and any other efficiencies gained. The findings of the research were then analysed, resulting in a list of potential financial and service benefits. The consequences of not proceeding with implementation of Electronic Monitoring were also clearly identified. These included:

  • Invoicing could suffer from poor auditability and probity.
  • The Authority may be paying inflated invoices.
  • Providers will be unable to locate or contact carers rapidly.
  • Providers may be unable to fulfil an adequate duty of care to domiciliary carers (e.g. lone workers).
  • Providers will be unable to monitor high risk and/or time-critical visits.
  • There is a potential negative impact on purchasing budgets.

Alan concludes his paper by stating, "In BCC, as a result of the work put in to identify and quantify the benefits, a clear case to proceed with Electronic Moni-toring has been made. When the system is implemented, the council is very likely to save money, remove vulnerabilities and make the home care system more auditable and accountable. The health and safety of carers working alone will be improved - if they are too late leaving or arriving, an alert will trigger a search for them. Finally, and most importantly, service users will benefit because the timing and amount of care being delivered will be automatically monitored and the Duty Team can proactively deal with problems."

A summary of Alan Mordue's Paper, 'Developing a business case for the electronic capture of home care visit times', published by CM2000 - Contact Simon Mallett or Polly Bastin on 0121 308 3010 or info@cm2000.co.uk for your free copy.